Journalism Cases from Canada https://validator.w3.org/feed/docs/rss2.html 8 Epilogue 7. The Decision-Making Point 6. “The Opposite of Contagion:” Steering a Balanced Path 5. Experts’ Opinions: An Abundance of Caution 4. The Harms of Sensationalism and Romanticization 3. Avoiding the Question, “How.” 2. Contagion Theory and a Reporting Taboo 1. A Matter of Public Interest Advised Otherwise: reporting on subway suicide 7. The decision point Request a password Contact us Case Studies Collection 6. Alternatives to the unedited video 6. Conversations Behind Closed Doors 3. Graphic content and broadcast policy 5. The 24-Hour News Cycle 2. Sensationalism or public interest? The ethical question 3. Capacity to Consent 1. Global goes to air: “‘Have you no souls? Have you no heart?’” 5. The Ethics Around Calling the Cops Graphic content: When is it worth airing? 4. Different Measures for Different Platforms 3. Who Makes the Ultimate Call 7. Public interest / journalistic purpose 4. Expectations of privacy in the social media age 5. The wildcard: social media 1. What Does the Public Need to Know 4. The way it played out: When graphic content was aired 1. Perspectives 2. Legal considerations The Dilemma First Hand: Kim Mackrael of The Globe and Mail First Hand: Andy Blatchford of the Canadian Press 7. Epilogue 9. Epilogue 4. Guidelines for Filming Vulnerable Subjects 7. Epilogue 9. Epilogue 8. Epilogue 10. Epilogue 10. Epilogue 7. Epilogue 2. Intervening in a Story 8. Epilogue 10. Epilogue Crossing The Line: Intervening in a Story 8. Epilogue 10. Epilogue Welcome to Journalism Cases from Canada